The effect of using core stability exercises on dynamic balance, some physical and skill variables for table tennis players

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Professor, Department of theories and applications of team sports and racket games, Faculty of Physical Education, University of Sadat City2

Abstract

The The aim of this research is to designing a training program thru core stability exercises and observes the effect of this suggested program on dynamic balance, some physical and skills variables for Table Tennis players, the researcher used the experimental method for the one experimental group.
The research sample was been selected from players of the Alnasr sporting club in Oman. The sample of the research was (5) players, the researcher applied physical and skills abilities tests after that he applied the training program using core stability exercises for (10) weeks, then he performed measurements on Dynamic balance, some physical and skills variables test.
 The results revealed that there were statistical differences between the Pre-measurement, Tracer- measurement, and the post-measurement regards variables Dynamic balance, some physical and skills variables the researcher recommended using the core stability exercises over the preparation period.

Keywords


Introduction

Karate Table tennis is distinguished from other sports by a great demand for its practice, as it is an interesting game that brings together many public and private advantages and benefits, which are not available in many other sports, which makes it at the top of friendly sports that are easy to practice to achieve various sporting and educational goals and purposes and this is evident. (12:9)

Basic Skills consider the backbone of table tennis, as they are the core of performance for this activity. They also help the player in attack and defense to score points and win the match, Although the basic skills in table tennis seem easy to perform, they require great effort in learning and mastering them due to the difficulty of implementing them due to the small size of the table, the racket, and the ball, as its practice requires the player to have a high concentration of concentration as well as a high skill, physical, tactical and psychological ability to suit the nature of this sport. (23:33) (7:12)

It is known and scientifically proven that the mastery of basic skills is that the player training on them from a young age and continues to train on them in every training unit throughout his sporting life in the sports field, and it is clear that the player does not rise to the national level or the global level in his country unless these sports skills are fully mastered. (9:36) (22)

Also, preparing the player physically to meet the requirements of the sporting activity is considered one of the main duties of the sports training process, which leads to the progression of the training state of the player to reach the higher levels in the practiced activity especially in table tennis. (23:50)

And It is known in advance that skill performance is closely related to special physical and motor abilities, as the mastery of skill performance depends on the extent to which the requirements for this performance are developed in terms of special physical and movement capabilities such as ( reaction speed - muscle power-  flexibility - agility - etc.) and often evaluates the level of performance Skills utilizing the extent of the individual's acquisition of these special physical and movement variables. (8:165)

The muscles of the core are the main physical and muscular center for the distribution of movement in the body, and for example, if the player moves the arms or legs, then he feels the movement of the core muscles and feels his physical and muscular center and leads to ease of movement control. Therefore, centering is the basis of movement performance and it is scientifically proven that the stability of the trunk is the group of muscles that work the stability of the abdomen, back, and thigh to perform the skill efficiently. (17:23) (2:61) (1)

Numerous researches have proven the importance and extent of the stability and rigidity of the lower part of the core in mastering human movements in general, as well as the increase in the efficiency of force production and the generation of more associated power and the movement of the limbs and control of their movements and the economy in the effort as a result of the stability and stability of the lower core area And surrounding muscles as a study by Sammson MK (2005)(20), Kibler (2006)(11), Willardson (2007)(24), Sata (2009)(19), Cissik, J.M. (2011)(6), Ali Hasoona (2012)(3), Sameh Tantawi, Sami Aker (2014)(18), Adel Muhammad (2017)(1).

Mohamed Sobhi (2004) believes that balance is an important physical ability that highlights its importance in daily life in general and in the field of physical education in particular, as it is an important component in the performance of motor skills, whether basic or complex skills. (16: 431)

 And the researcher believes that all the general and special physical characteristics required for the player to be possessed must be developed, in addition to the stability training of the trunk, which plays an important role in maintaining the balance of the body during movement, as the positioning is the basis of good motor performance, which is reflected in the skillful performance of the player, which helps to prepare the players physically. To be able to fulfill the requirements of the game's performance (physically, skillfully, and strategically) and to achieve the best possible level of achievement.

In light of the above and through the researcher's work as a table tennis trainer in addition to teaching table tennis at the Faculty of Physical Education at Sadat University, he sees the need to pay attention to the development of some important elements of physical fitness, which is reflected in the level of skill performance, and this is what prompted the researcher to design a program for trunk stability exercises and know its effect On the motor balance and the level of performance of some motor skills in table tennis.

Aims of the research:

To design a proposed program for core stability exercises for table tennis players, in an attempt to find out:

1. The effect of the proposed program on the Dynamicbalance for thesample under study.

2. The effect of the proposed program on the level of some physical variablesfor thesample under study.

3. The effect of the proposed program on the level of some skill variablesfor thesample under study.

Terminology of research:

CoreStability: Theabilityofthemusclesoftheabdomen, back, andthightocontrolthemovementperformed. (21:31)

Dynamic Balance: Theabilitytomaintainbodybalancewhilemoving. (15:334)

Methodology:

The researcher used the empirical approach because it is suitable for the nature of this study where it relied on the experimental design of the measurements (pre-, tracer, and Post) of one experimental group.

Sample

The research sample was been selected from players (Men) of the Alnasr sporting club in Oman. The sample of the research was (15) players, (10) players were selected to conduct exploratory studies, and (5) players for basic study, the researcher applied physical and skills abilities tests after that he applied for the training program thru core stability exercises throughout (10) weeks, then he performed measurements on physical and skills abilities test.


   Statistical characterization of the sample in the variables (Length, Weight, Age,and Training age) (N=10) (5 for exploratory studies & 10 for basic study)

 Variables

Measuring Unit

Mean

Median

St. Deviation

Skewness

Age

Year

 22.4

22

0.843

0.389

Height

CM

175.7

174.5

2.497

1.122

Weight

KG

74.1

74.5

2.998

0.096

TrainingAge

year

9.1

9.0

1.197

-0.233

Table (1) Shows the modality of the distribution of the sample in the variables (Length, Weight, Age, and Training Age) where the torsion coefficients

are limited to (±3) which makes it moderate in the distribution of the research sample in those variables.

Table (2)

   Statistical characterization of the sample in the physical and skill variables (N=10) (5 for exploratory studies & 5 for basic study)

Variables

Unit

Mean

Median

St. Deviation

Skewness

Muscularpower     

Meter

19.7

20

0.949

-0.234

PerformanceEndurance

Second

50.9

51

1.370

-0.104

Flexibly

cm

36.1

36

1.663

-0.145

Agility

Rept.

16.1

15.5

1.792

0.394

Coordination

Sec.

21.9

22

1.370

-0.104

MotorSpeed

Rept.

15.4

15

1.776

1.320

ReactionSpeed

Rept.

23.8

23.5

1.398

0.134

Precision

Rept.

22.3

22

1.567

1.546

StaticBalance

Second

28.1

28

0.876

-0.223

DynamicBalance

Degree

34.7

35

1.160

-0.342

Forehandcounterdrive

Rept.

7.4

8

1.578

-0.620

Backhandcounterdrive

Rept.

7.3

7.5

1.494

-0.140

Forehand   Loop

Rept.

5.1

5

0.738

-0.160

BackhandLoop

Rept.

4.5

4

1.179

0.255

Table (2) Shows the modality of the distribution of the sample in the physical and skill variables where the torsion coefficients are limited to (±3) which makes it moderate in the distribution of the research sample in those variables.


The proposed program for the Core Stability program:

According to the set goals of the program with its 3 stages and the degrees of training loads, the schedule was set for 10 weeks, at the rate of 3 units of core stability program every week. Thus, the proposed program included 30 units. The duration of each ranged from 90 – 120 minutes. Then, the researcher applied for the proposed Core stability program on the sample during the sports season 2018 / 2019 starting from Sunday 14 / 01 / 2018 to Thursday 22 / 03 / 2018. The program was applied under the supervision of the researcher and his assistants in special preparation period.

Methods of data collection:

Reference survey:

The researcher surveyed studies and scientific references in table tennis and sports training science that was available to the researcher to identify the global and professional variables in the operation of the research, as well as identify options in measuring these variables, as well as surveyed scientific references specialized in the sport of table tennis, defines basic skills in the sport of table tennis.

The tools used in the research:

The tape measure to measure the length "in centimeters" - the device for the thrower of the table tennis balls - a medical scale to measure the body weight "in kilograms" - table tennis - table tennis balls - cones - medical balls 1.5 kg weight - chalk - stopwatch - meter tape to measure distance - long ropes – Swedish ball – Bands - training mattresses.

Physical and skills tests used in the study:

- Passing test in (10) seconds ... to measure Motor speed.

- Passing accuracy test of movement ... to measure accuracy.

- The triangular jump test ... to measure agility.

- Numbered circuit test ... to measure coordination.

- Throwing a medical ball 1.5 kg test ... to measure Muscular Power.

- Fleishman Test … to measure flexibility.

- Ball ejected machine test ... to measure the speed of the striking hand's response.

-  Transition test between markers …to measure dynamic balance.

-Table test ... to measure performance endurance. (Edited by the researcher)

-Forehand counter drive test ... to measure Forehand counter drive.

-Backhand counter drive test ... to measure Backhand counter drive.

-Forehand Loop test ... to measure Forehand Loop drive.

-Backhand Loop test ... to measure Backhand Loop drive.

 

 

Scientific Transactions for Tests:

Validated Tests:

The validity of the tests was calculated by calculating the validity of differentiation by applying them to two groups of (5) players each. The first group represents AlNasr Sports Club players from the same research community and outside the research sample, and the participants in the League Table Tennis (Distinguished Group), while the second group represents the non-performance category from AlNasr Club players (Undistinguished group) on Sunday 7/1/2018, and the following table shows the significance of the differences between the two groups in all tests.


Table (3)

The significance of the differences between the two distinct and non-distinguishing groups in physical and skill tests (N1=N2=5)

Variables

unit

Distinct G.

non-distinguishing

Average Difference

T.Test

Mean

S.DEV

Mean

S.DEV

Muscularpower         

Meter

19.8

0.837

14

0.707

5.8

9.333*

PerformanceEndurance

Second

43.6

0.548

51.8

0.837

8.2

41.000*

Flexibly

Cm

35.6

1.817

29.4

1.517

6.2

6.395*

Agility

Rept.

14.8

0.837

9.8

0.836

5.0

9.129*

Coordination

Sec.

14.6

1.157

21.2

1.304

6.6

5.880*

MotorSpeed

Rept.

15.4

1.673

10.4

0.894

5.0

4.767*

ReactionSpeed

Rept.

24.2

1.643

17.6

0.548

6.6

7.117*

Precision

Rept.

21.6

0.894

17.2

0.837

4.4

17.963*

StaticBalance

Second

28.0

1.000

20.4

1.517

7.6

9.355*

DynamicBalance

Degree

34.6

1.140

16.6

0.894

16

25.298*

Forehand counterdrive

Rept.

7.8

1.643

3.8

0.837

4.0

5.657*

Backhand counter drive

Rept.

6.2

1.095

2.0

0.707

4.2

7.208*

Forehand   Loop

Rept.

5.2

0.837

1.6

0.548

3.6

9.000*

Backhand Loop

Rept.

4.0

1.225

1.6

0.548

2.4

4.707*

“T” tabulated value at (0.05) = 2.306

 

Table (3) showing there are statistically significant differences between the (Distinct group/ non-distinguishing group) groups in the variables under study, which shows the difference between the two groups in these variables since the calculated “T” value is more than the tabulated “T” value. So that the tests can be used.

Stability for Tests:

 To find the stability of tests, the researcher applied the test and repeat it with a time interval of six days, and the researcher used Pearson’s simple correlation coefficient to find the correlation coefficient between the results of the first and second apply.


 

Table (4)

The Correlation coefficient between the results of the first and                     second apply of the tests under research N= (5)

Variables

unit

First Apply

Second Apply

R     Value

Mean

S.DEV

Mean

S.DEV

Muscularpower         

Meter

19.8

0.837

20.4

0.894

0.830*

PerformanceEndurance

Second

43.6

0.548

44.0

0.548

0.764*

Flexibly

Cm

35.6

1.817

35.4

1.949

0.974*

Agility

Rept.

14.8

0.837

15.0

0.707

0.845*

Coordination

Sec.

14.6

1.157

14.8

1.342

0.943*

MotorSpeed

Rept.

15.4

1.673

15.6

1.342

0.869*

ReactionSpeed

Rept.

24.2

1.643

24.0

1.000

0.913*

Precision

Rept.

21.6

0.894

21.8

0.837

0.869*

StaticBalance

Second

28.0

1.000

28.2

1.095

0.913*

DynamicBalance

Degree

34.6

1.140

34.8

1.095

0.921*

Forehand counterdrive

Rept.

7.8

1.643

8.0

1.581

0.866*

Backhand counter drive

Rept.

6.2

1.095

6.4

1.095

0.721*

Forehand   Loop

Rept.

5.2

0.837

5.2

1.095

0.764*

Backhand Loop

Rept.

4.0

1.225

4.2

1.304

0.939*

 

It is evident from Table (4) that the value of correlation coefficients between the first and second apply for all variables ranged between (0.721 - 0.974), and these values ​​are statistically significant at a significance level (0.05), which indicates that they have high stability coefficients and the stability of the tests.

Statistical processing:

The researcher used the statistical program with the following statistical data: (Mean - Median - standard deviation - simple correlation coefficient Person – one way analysis of variance (Anova) - LSD test.

  The researcher took (0.05) to be statistically significant.


 

 

 

Results:

 

Table (5)

Statistical characterization of the pre-, tracer, and post for measurements          of the research sample in the study variables N=5

Skewness

St. Deviation

Median

Mean

Measurement

Variables

0.609

0.548

18

17.6

Pre- Test

Muscular power

1.749

1.517

21

20.6

Tracer- Test

1.258

0.894

26

25.4

Post Test

1.118

1.517

53

52.4

Pre- Test

Performance Endurance

2.236

0.894

50

50.4

Tracer- Test

0.541

1.304

46

46.2

Post Test

0.512

0.837

32

32.2

Pre- Test

Flexibly

0.512

0.837

35

34.8

Tracer- Test

1.361

1.225

37

37.0

Post Test

0.512

0.837

12

12.2

Pre- Test

Agility

0.541

1.304

15

14.8

Tracer- Test

0.5122

0.837

16

15.8

Post Test

0.405

1.140

17

17.4

Pre- Test

Coordination

1.293

1.095

16

16.2

Tracer- Test

0.405

1.140

14

13.6

Post Test

0.512

0.837

12

11.8

Pre- Test

Motor Speed

1.258

0.894

15

14.4

Tracer- Test

1.258

0.894

18

17.4

Post Test

0.512

0.837

20

20.2

Pre- Test

Reaction Speed

0.512

0.836

23

22.8

Tracer- Test

1.258

0.894

25

25.6

Post Test

0.166

1.342

20

20.6

Pre- Test

Precision

1.293

1.095

23

22.8

Tracer- Test

0.5122

0.837

26

25.8

Post Test

2.236

0.447

27

27.2

Pre- Test

Static Balance

0.405

1.140

30

30.4

Tracer- Test

0.512

0.837

35

34.8

Post Test

0.512

0.837

34

33.8

Pre- Test

Dynamic Balance

0.000

0.707

37

37.0

Tracer- Test

0.609

0.548

39

39.4

Post Test

0.607

0.458

7

7.4

Pre- Test

Forehand counter drive

0.512

0.837

10

9.8

Tracer- Test

0.000

0.707

12

12

Post Test

0.609

0.548

6

5.6

Pre- Test

Backhand counter drive

0.512

0.837

7

7.2

Tracer- Test

0.609

1.095

8

8.8

Post Test

1.258

0.894

5

5.6

Pre- Test

Forehand   Loop

0.609

0.548

8

7.6

Tracer- Test

0.609

0.547

12

11.6

Post Test

0.609

0.548

5

4.6

Pre- Test

Backhand Loop

0.405

1.140

6

6.4

Tracer- Test

0.512

0.837

10

10.2

Post Test

It is evident from Table (5), which indicates the homogeneity of the research sample and the possibility of processing it statistically.

Table (6)

One-way Anova of the pre-, tracer, and post for sample                    measurements in the variables under study N=5

Anova      Value

Mean squares

Sum of squares

Freedom Degree

Source of the contrast

Variables

11.936*

56.033

112.067

2

Between Groups

Muscular power

4.694

56.333

12

Within Groups

 

168.400

14

Total

17.735*

44.583

89.167

2

Between Groups

Performance Endurance

2.514

30.167

12

Within Groups

 

119.333

14

Total

30.174*

28.917

57.833

2

Between Groups

Flexibly

0.958

11.500

12

Within Groups

 

69.333

14

Total

13.647*

16.300

32.600

2

Between Groups

Agility

1.194

14.333

12

Within Groups

 

46.933

14

Total

23.317*

21.050

42.100

2

Between Groups

Coordination

0.903

10.833

12

Within Groups

 

52.933

14

Total

10.800*

30.000

60.000

2

Between Groups

Motor Speed

2.788

33.333

12

Within Groups

 

93.333

14

Total

17.539*

30.450

60.900

2

Between Groups

Reaction Speed

1.736

20.833

12

Within Groups

 

81.733

14

Total

7.571*

23.133

46.267

2

Between Groups

Precision

3.056

36.667

12

Within Groups

 

82.933

14

Total

27.687*

63.450

126.900

2

Between Groups

Static Balance

2.292

27.500

12

Within Groups

 

154.400

14

Total

20.359*

32.800

65.600

2

Between Groups

Dynamic Balance

1.611

19.333

12

Within Groups

 

84.9333

14

Total

10.973*

19.050

38.100

2

Between Groups

Forehand counter drive

1.736

20.833

12

Within Groups

 

58.933

14

Total

14.640*

12.200

24.400

2

Between Groups

Backhand counter drive

0.833

10.000

12

Within Groups

 

34.400

14

Total

12.844*

33.717

67.433

2

Between Groups

Forehand   Loop

2.625

31.500

12

Within Groups

 

98.933

14

Total

6.888*

24.300

48.600

2

Between Groups

Backhand Loop

3.528

42.333

12

Within Groups

 

90.933

14

Total

“F” tabulated value at (0.05) = 3.880

     

 

Table (6) shows that there are statistically significant differences at a level of significance (0.05) between the measurements of the pre, tracer, and post research sample in all the variables under study, and to clarify the significance of the differences between these measurements ... The researcher will calculate the lowest significant difference using the LSD test.

 


 

Table (7)

The significance of the differences between the averages of the measurements of the pre, Tracer, and post for in all variables of the sample under study

LSD

Value

Deference between Means

Mean

Measures

Variables

M3

M2

M1

2.986

7.2*

4.0*

 

17.6

Measure 1

Muscular power

3.2*

 

 

20.6

Measure 2

 

 

 

25.4

Measure 3

2.185

6.7*

2.5*

 

52.4

Measure 1

Performance Endurance

4.2*

 

 

50.4

Measure 2

 

 

 

46.2

Measure 3

1.349

5.2*

2.8*

 

32.2

Measure 1

Flexibly

2.3*

 

 

34.8

Measure 2

 

 

 

37.0

Measure 3

1.506

3.5*

2.7*

 

12.2

Measure 1

Agility

0.8

 

 

14.8

Measure 2

 

 

 

15.8

Measure 3

1.310

4.5*

2.2*

 

17.4

Measure 1

Coordination

2.3*

 

 

16.2

Measure 2

 

 

 

13.6

Measure 3

2.301

5.0*

3.3*

 

11.8

Measure 1

Motor Speed

1.7

 

 

14.4

Measure 2

 

 

 

17.4

Measure 3

1.816

5.3*

2.8*

 

20.2

Measure 1

Reaction Speed

2.5*

 

 

22.8

Measure 2

 

 

 

25.6

Measure 3

2.409

4.3*

3.0*

 

20.6

Measure 1

Precision

1.3

 

 

22.8

Measure 2

 

 

 

25.8

Measure 3

2.086

7.5*

4.5*

 

27.2

Measure 1

Static Balance

3.0*

 

 

30.4

Measure 2

 

 

 

34.8

Measure 3

1.749

5.3*

3.3*

 

33.8

Measure 1

Dynamic Balance

2.0*

 

 

37.0

Measure 2

 

 

 

39.4

Measure 3

1.816

3.8*

2.8*

 

7.4

Measure 1

Forehand counter drive

1.0

 

 

9.8

Measure 2

 

 

 

12

Measure 3

1.258

3.0*

2.3*

 

5.6

Measure 1

Backhand counter drive

0.7

 

 

7.2

Measure 2

 

 

 

8.8

Measure 3

2.233

5.7*

2.8*

 

5.6

Measure 1

Forehand   Loop

2.8*

 

 

7.6

Measure 2

 

 

 

11.6

Measure 3

2.589

4.8*

2.3

 

4.6

Measure 1

Backhand Loop

2.6*

 

 

6.4

Measure 2

 

 

 

10.2

Measure 3


Table (7) indicates that there are statistically significant differences at the level of significance (0.05) between the averages of the measurements of the pre, tracer and post research sample. In all variables in favor of the mean of the post measurement.


Discussion:

It is evident from the results of Table (6) that there are statistically significant differences at the level of significance between the measurements of the pre, tracer, and post research sample in the physical and skills variables, which are: ( Muscular power, Performance Endurance , Flexibility , Agility , coordination , Motor Speed , Reaction Speed , Precision ,  Static Balance , Dynamic Balance , Forehand counter drive , Backhand counter drive , Forehand   Loop,  Backhand  Loop ) of the sample under study.

To clarify the significance of the differences between these measurements, the researcher calculated the lowest meaning difference using the LSD test to determine the significance of the differences between these measurements, as Table (7) indicates that there are statistically significant differences at the level of significance (0.05) between the averages of the measurements of the pre, tracer and post research sample In the physical and skills variables in favor of the mean of the Post measurement.

The researcher attributes these incident differences to the construction of the training program using core stability exercises that were applied during the special preparation period and the preparation for competitions on table tennis players for the sample under study, which gives a positive indication of improvement in the level of physical and skills variables of the sample under study.

It is evident from Table (7) that showing there is statistically significant differences between the (pre, tracer, and post) measurements for the post measurement.

This is supported by Chabut (2009) that good and regular training of the core area leads to the cooperation between all the muscles in it and to perform the movements effectively and with more attractive force. (4)

This result is consistent with the results of the study of Cissik, JM.(2002)(5), Samson (2005)(20), Willardson(2007)(24), Kibler (2006)(11), Sata (2009)(19), Mohamed hamed ( 2013 )(14), Ihab ( 2013 )(10) Sameh & Sami(2014)(18), Mohamed Jamal ( 2016)(13), Adel Mohamed (2017)(1) indicate that Core stability exercises programs lead to an increase and improvement in Dynamic Balance, Physical and skill level.

       Through the above ... the researcher believes that the significance of the differences occurring between the averages of the research sample measurements is the subject of the research sample for the proposed core stability exercises program under consideration.

And which relied in its design on the scientific rules and foundations to develop and improve the level of physical and skill variables under study.

      This result verifies the validity of what was stated in the hypothesis, which states that “there are statistically significant differences between the averages of the pre-, tracer- and post-measurements in the level of some physical and skill variables under study in favor of the post-measurement.”

Conclusions:

According to the goals and nature of this study, and within the sample of the research and the methodology applied therein, as per the data collected by the researcher and the results of statistical analysis, the researcher reached the following conclusions:

1-    The Core Stability exercises program is effective in the improvement of Dynamic Balance for table tennis players.

2-    The Core Stability exercises program is effective in the improvement of Physical Variables for table tennis players.

3-    The Core Stability exercises program is effective in the improvement of some skills variables for table tennis players.


 


Reference

Adel Ramdan (2017):The effect of Core stability exercises on some physical elements and the level of performance of defensive foot movements for junior leagues, Journal of Comprehensive Education, p. 2, Faculty of Physical Education for Girls, Zagazig University.

 

Abdul Rahman Abdul Hamid Zaher ( 2000):Physiology of jumping and jumping competitions, Al-Kitab Center for Publishing, Cairo.

 

Ali Hasoona ( 2012 ):The effect of a program of stability exercises for the central part of the body on some health variables for football players, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Physical Education for Boys, Helwan University.

Chabut (2009):Core Strength for Dummies, Wiley Publishing, inc,U.S.A,

Cissik, JM.(2002):Programming abdominal training, part one. Strength Cond J 24: 9–15, 2002

Cissik, J.M. (2011):The role of core training in athletic performance, injury prevention, and injury treatment, strength and conditioning journal, 33(1), 10-15.

Eleen Wadeaa Farag , Salwa EZZ Alden ( 2002 ):The reference in table tennis", Monshaat al-Maaref, Alexandria.

Essam Abdulkhalek(2005):Sports training (theories - applications), 12th edition, Monshaat al-Maaref, Alexandria.

Ewis ALgibali ( 2000 ):Athletic Training (Theory and Practice), G.M.S, Cairo.

Ihab Adb AlFatah Shehata (2013):, "Effect Of Core Stability Exercise on Some Physical Abilities Strength and Death of For Hand and Back Hand Ground Strokes for The   Tennis   Players”, The   4 International Conference on Sport and Exercise Since 26- 29 March, Bangkok, Thailand.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Kilber WB, Press J, Sciascia A ( 2006 ):The role of core stability in athletic function. Sports Med.; 36(3), 189-198

Matt Smith, William Naty  ( 2006 ):International Table Tennis, Human Kinetics, United States of America, 2006.

Mohamed Gamal Eldin Mohamed (2016):The effect of using some core stability exercises on improving the accuracy of jumping shooting during playing situations and some elements of physical fitness for basketball juniors, Scientific Journal of Physical Education and Sports Science, p. 77, Faculty of Physical Education for Boys, Helwan University.

Mohamed hamed fahmy (2013 ):The effect of core stability exercises on the development of some elements of physical fitness for female basketball players, Scientific Journal of Physical Education and Sports Science, p. 67, Faculty of Physical Education for Boys, Helwan University.

Mohamed Sobhi Hasanin  ( 2001 ):Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education, Part One, 4th Edition, Dar Al-Fikr Al-Arabi, Cairo.

Mohamed Sobhi Hasanin  ( 2004 ):Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education, Part One, 5th Edition, Dar Al-Fikr Al-Arabi, Cairo.

Rischard Son C, Hodges P, Hides J (2004):The Rapeutic Exercise for Lumbopelvic Stabilization a, motor Control Approach for The Treatment and Prevention of Low Back pain 2nd ed. London: Church Living Stone,

Sameh Sh. Tantawi, Sami Abdel       Salam ker (2014):The Effect of Core Stability Training on Some Physical Abilities and The Effectiveness of Attack Performance for the practitioners of Kumite" The Assiut Journal of Sports Science and Arts 221- 239.

Sata, K motha, M., (2009):Does Core Strength Training in fluence Running Kinetics, Lower Extremity Stability and Soon Performance In Running Strength Cond Res, 23, 133- 140

Samson, M.K (2005):The Effects of a Five-week core stabilization- Training Program on Dynamic Balance in Tennis Athletes Master's Thesis, West Virginia University

Stanton, R, Reburn. P, R., & Humphries, B, (2004):The Effect of Shortterm Swisball Training on Core Stability and Reuning Economy J. Strength Cond Res. 18 (2).

Tarek Ebrahim (2013):Developing the speed and accuracy of some offensive and defensive skills for table tennis juniors under 14 years old in Sharkia Governorate, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Physical Education for Boys, Zagazig   University.

The Englishtable tennis Association ( 2001):Table Tennis, A.& C. Black Ltd., London.

Willardson, Jeffrey M. (2007):Core Stability For Athletes (7/7/2008) Phd., Csis, This paper was Presented as Part Of The NSCA Hot Topicceries, All Infromation Containted Herein Is Copy Of The NSCA .